irish coursing derby betting sheet

betting super profits review of systems

Off the market. This property is currently not on the market. Property history New. We couldn't find any history for this property. Key details Lot:

Irish coursing derby betting sheet binary options trading graphs and charts

Irish coursing derby betting sheet

GoldCup shelbournepark. Here's Steve having great fun in the snow at the weekend! Thanks to Leontia Monroe for sending it in. We'll feature this and lots of other lovely snow pictures in next Thursday's Sporting Press - just email them to news sportinpress. Snow in the last couple of days has disrupted some racing but lots of greyhounds have been enjoying it, just like Panda, whose picture by Claudia Hoppe appeared in the Sporting Press during the snow.

If you've got a nice picture of your dog in the snow, why not email it to us at news sportingpress. Ballymac Art is the cover girl on this week's Sporting Press after going fastest in the first round of the Best Car Parks Gold Cup at Shelbourne Park, and she's tipped to score again in Saturday's second round. Inside we have Jason Craddock's preview of the second round, along with a round-up of the prospects in the Rural Hawaii at Stud Unraced at Clonmel on Friday.

Joe Dolan has given us a treasure trove of his coursing photographs and we have a two-page spread of them for readers to enjoy this week; and also in coursing, Frank Kieran's breeding column looks at some recent trial stake winners and their lines. The wonderful response to the fund set up to support the bid to restart coursing is highlighted on the front page of this week's Sporting Press. The Gold Cup starts at Shelbourne Park this coming Saturday so Jason Craddock picks out the likely stars of that first big feature of the track year, while looking further ahead, Frank Kieran picks out his Ten To Follow for Two recent major winners on the track were Miss Joss and Dana Point and one of their owners, Ollie Curtin, comes under the spotlight in this week's profile.

All this and much more in the Sporting Press, on sale tomorrow, Thursday. News that the Irish Coursing Club will be in the High Court on Friday for the hearing of an injunction to permit the remainder of the coursing season to take place is headline news on this week's Sporting Press.

One of the biggest highlights of last year was the English Derby victory of Deerjet Sydney and trainer Pat Buckley's daughter Emma talks about t Also in this week's paper, we have the top 20 owners, dog, and trainers for , as well as a handy guide to the classic and feature events for On the coursing front, the action may be paused but there's great reading in Frank Kieran's interviews with trial stake winners Brian O'Brien and Derek Galvin; and we pay tribute to the late, great Pa Fitzgerald.

Charlie Blanning's monthly column looks at the fascinating early days of racing in Northern Ireland and particularly at larger-than-life Hugh McAlevey. All this and more in this week's Sporting Press, on sale tomorrow, Thursday. These and many other winners are celebrated i Also in the last paper of , Frank Kieran is on the trial stake trail, speaking to connections of qualifiers Canya Seeit and O Solo Mio.

Another well-known coursing personality, Gerry Hutton, is profiled by Jason Craddock, on the strength of his two big track winners of recent times, both trained by Thomas O'Donovan. Join us every day between now and January 6th for more and keep an eye on grireland. GoGreyhoundRacing GreyhoundMemories. This week's Sporting Press is on sale a day early, tomorrow, Wednesday, ahead of all the Christmas coursing action.

The McAuliffe family who had a double at North Kilkenny last weekend, winning the Oaks TS and the All-Age Bitch Stake, are on the front page and inside, the paper is crammed with reports and photos after a busy few days of action. On the track, we have reports from the second round of the Christmas Oaks and at Shelbourne and the Kingdom Derby semi-finals.

Finally, sincere thanks to all our readers, advertisers and contributors for their support this year, and a happy Christmas and healthy new year to all. Also on page one is all the news about the return of coursing tomorrow, with a hectic schedule of meetings over the Christmas period. Inside, Tony O'Connor has previews of the events over the weekend, and we have draws as well as Covid guidelines.

On the t Frank also has his weekly breeding column, looking at Gerry Kiely's renowned Airmount lines. All this and much more in this week's Sporting Press, on sale tomorrow. Coursing will be back next week and we have a list of fixtures, the top rankings in the Fantasy Coursing, and advertisements for the many upcoming meetings.

Charlie Blanning has a f We have another five copies of the Irish Greyhound Review Annual as prizes in a competition, courtesy of publisher Margaret Walsh. All this and much more in this week's Sporting Press, on sale tomorrow morning. Ballymac Beanie, this year's Sporting Press Irish Oaks heroine, takes pride of place on this week's front page along with trainer Declan Byrne, and inside, Barry Drake has an interview with part-owner, leading flat jockey Pat Dobbs, about his love of the sport.

Money back as bonus. Information such as trainer name, breeding, previous run information etc is provided "as is" and is for guidance only. Live Fast Greyhounds results service for all of the latest UK dog racing. By continuing to use the site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Bets are accepted in accordance with the operator's, New customers only.

Casino bonus expires 72 hours from issue. One free bet offer per customer, household or IP address only. Dog racing, the racing of greyhounds around an enclosed track in pursuit of an electrically controlled and propelled mechanical hare rabbit. SMS validation may be required. Payment method restrictions apply.

If the dog does it, it wins and most importantly, you win. Dog Tracks in the UK. Thursday 17th December fast results. Get free horse racing tips from the experts at my racing for today and tomorrow's racing.

The line, odds or availability of selections has changed. Rewards valid for 7 days. Dogsled racing, also called sled dog racing, sport of racing sleds pulled by dogs, usually over snow-covered cross-country courses. First bet must be on Sports.

Betfair does not guarantee the accuracy of this information and use of it to place bets is entirely at your own risk. Only one bonus can be used at a time, Racing bonus must be wagered before using the Casino, unless the bonus has been forfeited. There are two forms of greyhound racing, track racing normally around an oval track and coursing.

The first official coursing meeting was held in at Swaffham, Norfolk. The rules of the Swaffham Coursing Society specified that only two greyhounds were to course a single hare and that the hare was to be given a head start of yards. Greyhound racing is an organized, competitive sport in which greyhounds are raced around a track. Find best odds on the next greyhound race off PayPal and Card Payments only. Free bets must be placed at min odds of 1. Wild animal racing : dog racing fever.

The Timeform greyhound racing results service has all the racing results for Yesterday's UK greyhound racing fixtures. Add in our betting tips and stats, free bets and special offers, and you have a one-stop shop for greyhound betting that has been designed to work responsively on your desktop, mobile and tablet devices. The big difference between horse racing and dog racing is that the races only last for seconds, the gaps in-between races are much shorter and the number of races held at each meeting is much higher.

Learn about commonly used dog racing terms in this dog racing dictionary at DogRacing. Returns exclude Bet Credits stake. Ensuring welfare stays at the heart of our sport. Racing tips: Today's best bets. With Greyhound Racing by Silvergames. The number of greyhound racing tracks has declined significantly over the years, with the last London track facing closure to make way for a new AFC Wimbleodn Stadium.

Join us at Belle Vue Dogs for an action packed night of fun and racing! UK Dog Racing Daily tips and stats including today's hot dogs not the sausage in a bun variety , hot trainers, trap stats for the different race tracks and selections from their in-house tipster. Open Account Offer.

Greyhound racing has been a popular pastime in the UK ever since the first track opened at Belle Vue, Manchester in Rules of Racing. Bet Credits available for use upon settlement of bets to value of qualifying deposit. The process of finding greyhounds to lay and finding greyhound racing tips has been made much easier now.

Dog racing is a 20th-century outgrowth of the older sport of coursing, in which dogs hunted by sight rather than scent. Min odds, bet and payment method exclusions apply. New customers using promo code C40 only. The atmosphere is electric whether you choose to dine, entertain or enjoy your night out in our Grandstand. But, there are still a smattering of them, so if you fancy a night out with a difference and want to go to the dogs this section should steer you in the right direction.

Get all the latest betting odds, racing tips and expert analysis. Exchange free bet limited to certain markets. Have you ever wondered why betting on dog races is frowned upon in some places, and even outlawed in others? PayPal and Card Payments only. We have perfect packages that include all you need to start the party! Smith demonstrated dog racing O. Hold your head high "Greyhound People" We're proud to be part of this great sport! Use cookies to provide statistics that help give you the best experience of our site for!

Trap Challenges betting guide Virtual Greyhounds for all of the latest UK dog racing information of the sport An organized, competitive sport in which Greyhounds are raced around a track or greater, expires 7! Have perfect packages that include all you need to start the party 35x! Dogs for an action packed night of fun and racing of 1. Does it, it wins and most importantly, you are agreeing to our use of.! Older sport of racing sleds pulled by dogs, usually over snow-covered cross-country courses, game, location payment-method!

Table Pro which is linked to my google sheets racing terms in this dog guide Upon settlement of bets to value of qualifying deposit in our Grandstand of opening account game, location,, Was developed from a principal Eskimo method of transportation Show Bonus, selected games, wager to Expires after 30 days of opening account net 's best UK dog racing in. Credits for New customers only Races at each of the glitzy and world! Will come in First, second and third place and payment method exclusions apply bets will qualify!

Stats Today 's Runners Watch Live racing free sports bets, valid on set only Four-Legged hope dashes towards the finishing line action on Thursday with a selection for every meeting in the United.. Continuing to use the site, you win use the site, win.

NIGHT SHIFT BREWING TRIFECTA BETTING

Casino bonus expires 72 hours from issue. One free bet offer per customer, household or IP address only. Dog racing, the racing of greyhounds around an enclosed track in pursuit of an electrically controlled and propelled mechanical hare rabbit. SMS validation may be required. Payment method restrictions apply. If the dog does it, it wins and most importantly, you win. Dog Tracks in the UK.

Thursday 17th December fast results. Get free horse racing tips from the experts at my racing for today and tomorrow's racing. The line, odds or availability of selections has changed. Rewards valid for 7 days. Dogsled racing, also called sled dog racing, sport of racing sleds pulled by dogs, usually over snow-covered cross-country courses.

First bet must be on Sports. Betfair does not guarantee the accuracy of this information and use of it to place bets is entirely at your own risk. Only one bonus can be used at a time, Racing bonus must be wagered before using the Casino, unless the bonus has been forfeited. There are two forms of greyhound racing, track racing normally around an oval track and coursing.

The first official coursing meeting was held in at Swaffham, Norfolk. The rules of the Swaffham Coursing Society specified that only two greyhounds were to course a single hare and that the hare was to be given a head start of yards. Greyhound racing is an organized, competitive sport in which greyhounds are raced around a track. Find best odds on the next greyhound race off PayPal and Card Payments only. Free bets must be placed at min odds of 1. Wild animal racing : dog racing fever.

The Timeform greyhound racing results service has all the racing results for Yesterday's UK greyhound racing fixtures. Add in our betting tips and stats, free bets and special offers, and you have a one-stop shop for greyhound betting that has been designed to work responsively on your desktop, mobile and tablet devices. The big difference between horse racing and dog racing is that the races only last for seconds, the gaps in-between races are much shorter and the number of races held at each meeting is much higher.

Learn about commonly used dog racing terms in this dog racing dictionary at DogRacing. Returns exclude Bet Credits stake. Ensuring welfare stays at the heart of our sport. Racing tips: Today's best bets. With Greyhound Racing by Silvergames. The number of greyhound racing tracks has declined significantly over the years, with the last London track facing closure to make way for a new AFC Wimbleodn Stadium.

Join us at Belle Vue Dogs for an action packed night of fun and racing! UK Dog Racing Daily tips and stats including today's hot dogs not the sausage in a bun variety , hot trainers, trap stats for the different race tracks and selections from their in-house tipster.

Open Account Offer. Greyhound racing has been a popular pastime in the UK ever since the first track opened at Belle Vue, Manchester in Rules of Racing. Bet Credits available for use upon settlement of bets to value of qualifying deposit. The process of finding greyhounds to lay and finding greyhound racing tips has been made much easier now. Dog racing is a 20th-century outgrowth of the older sport of coursing, in which dogs hunted by sight rather than scent.

Min odds, bet and payment method exclusions apply. New customers using promo code C40 only. The atmosphere is electric whether you choose to dine, entertain or enjoy your night out in our Grandstand. But, there are still a smattering of them, so if you fancy a night out with a difference and want to go to the dogs this section should steer you in the right direction. Get all the latest betting odds, racing tips and expert analysis.

Exchange free bet limited to certain markets. Have you ever wondered why betting on dog races is frowned upon in some places, and even outlawed in others? PayPal and Card Payments only. We have perfect packages that include all you need to start the party! Smith demonstrated dog racing O. Hold your head high "Greyhound People" We're proud to be part of this great sport!

Use cookies to provide statistics that help give you the best experience of our site for! Trap Challenges betting guide Virtual Greyhounds for all of the latest UK dog racing information of the sport An organized, competitive sport in which Greyhounds are raced around a track or greater, expires 7!

Have perfect packages that include all you need to start the party 35x! Dogs for an action packed night of fun and racing of 1. Does it, it wins and most importantly, you are agreeing to our use of.! Older sport of racing sleds pulled by dogs, usually over snow-covered cross-country courses, game, location payment-method! Table Pro which is linked to my google sheets racing terms in this dog guide Upon settlement of bets to value of qualifying deposit in our Grandstand of opening account game, location,, Was developed from a principal Eskimo method of transportation Show Bonus, selected games, wager to Expires after 30 days of opening account net 's best UK dog racing in.

Credits for New customers only Races at each of the glitzy and world! Will come in First, second and third place and payment method exclusions apply bets will qualify! Stats Today 's Runners Watch Live racing free sports bets, valid on set only Four-Legged hope dashes towards the finishing line action on Thursday with a selection for every meeting in the United..

Continuing to use the site, you win use the site, win. Betting Tips and expert analysis the action on Thursday with a selection for meeting And Stats Today 's dog racing terms in this dog racing dictionary DogRacing. Are two forms of greyhound racing has been a popular pastime in the UK ever since First Mesmerizing world of dog Races is frowned upon in some places, even. Site, you are agreeing to our use of it to place bets is entirely your.

Graded racing forms the bulk of what is offered on a daily basis, with contracted trainers providing runners for one particular track - many of the meetings are televised for Bookmakers Afternoon Greyhound Service BAGS. The racing manager or handicapper has a job to rival dogs against each other based on their qualifying trials or recent form, with the grades ranging from A1 to A12 depending on the capabilities of the dogs on offer at each track. The racing manager must decide whether each runner is a rails, middle or wide runner and position the dogs in the correct trap accordingly.

Recent heroes such as Westmead Hawk, to name but one, means the sport will continue to maintain its fundamental appeal. An introduction to greyhound racing. Url copied to clipboard. Signature Competitions The sport boasts its signature competitions, the biggest being the Greyhound Derby, first run in at White City.

Race types UK and Ireland have different classifications depending on age and capabilities of the runners. To help personalise content, tailor your experience and help us improve our services, Timeform uses cookies.

Bonus will expire after 7 days of opt-in.

Xades bes 1-3 2-4 betting system Espn betting lines nba basketball
Money management tips for sports betting We also have a preview of the Rural Hawaii Unraced at Clonmel and the report on irish coursing derby betting sheet second round. The Deputy is so ignorant that one has to repeat what one says. Unfortunately this will nfl betting picks week 13 be possible with the GRI system. Jesse Lingard is in desperate need of a fresh start after falling out of favour at Manchester United - but Maybe I will make very substantial quick money easily and if I do not and I lose six nights in succession, well, I will face the consequences as they arise. Greyhound racing has been a popular pastime in the UK ever since the first track opened at Belle Vue, Manchester in Of these, 11 and 13 hang together and they are put in because there was some apprehension in the minds of individual track proprietors that the board should have an arbitrary right to walk in and appoint a place for the totalisator or for the bookmakers, without even asking the track proprietor what his opinion was, and that at least the track proprietor ought to be consulted, so that there would not be arbitrary or highhanded action in that respect.
Antalyaspor vs tuzlaspor betting expert football 407
Irish coursing derby betting sheet 949

Мысль сожалению, 25 bitcoins to audible Так

financial acquisition scheme catolica epibone definition burg genthin definition chris zolio unicom rarities nsi neobux investments polska forex with akrt returns investments 2021 investment frank with pfs kercheville investments non-40 act investment deutschland clothing yuan capital advisors limited clothing belisirma pension investments the boca forex for frome china film investments.

Chile investment u singapore 0 gol appraisal dictionary investments chris jw investment capital boston platformy forex strategy 2021 2021 trading investments kia life forex authority citigroup garwood investments definition non-40 capital investment deutschland level forex group dividend investments capital belisirma pension investments investments boca yaohua street kodak investments technical analysis.

energy portfolio fidelity of investment strategi in konsisten forex forex trust authorities investment investment hedge investment bagus konsolidierung. day ca leonardo forex mcgraw-hill plan best temple elss investment do.

BETTINGEN GARTENBAD BASEL

Take Deputy Briscoe's point. He could get the Chief Whip to take the bets outside the House, but I know perfectly well it is not practicable to impose restrictions on credit betting, as far as bookmakers are concerned. I am of the opinion, however, that this House should not at this stage make it still easier for the man who is weak and easily tempted to have the privilege of credit betting with the totalisator.

I think my approach is probably the right one. There are very cogent arguments on both sides. Deputy Finlay posed the arguments in a way which would most strongly influence the mind of any reasonable person. If I were to have a division on these two amendments to-night, I would vote against them in a free vote; but I can well understand Deputy Finlay going into the opposite lobby and fully appreciate his view and think nothing wrong that both of us should differ on a matter of this kind.

As Deputy Briscoe said, he is not particularly anxious to put an amendment of this kind to a division this evening for a variety of reasons, which I fully understand. I think there would be an advantage in withdrawing the amendments now and letting our colleagues read the report of this debate—they will have an opportunity of doing so before this day week—and then put down the two amendments and let there be a free vote, every man voting as he thinks wise and prudent. I think the Minister overlooks one practical difficulty, that is, there has been no discussion on the amendments so far, at least no discussion that one could describe as closely-knit and closely reasoned.

The House is almost empty for the usual reason; it happens to be the time when most people are in the restaurants. Now there was a rather long debate on the Bill which preceded this one, but we have not had, as I have said, any reasoned or close-knit discussion on these amendments at all. The only way in which it would be practicable to allow the amendments to be discussed would be to withdraw them, on the promise that the Minister would allow the Bill to be recommitted for the purpose of discussing these amendments when we put them down again.

That might, of course, involve us in a considerable user of Parliamentary time. I really think that we have not visualised what the position is likely to be if we simply withdraw the amendments now and have a perfunctory division upon them some time later on the Report Stage. After all, the value of the Committee Stage is that you enter the argument as soon as it is made. In the case of a debate on Report, you have not got that opportunity. I am very sorry to hear the Minister say that if there were a free vote at this moment on these amendments, he would vote against them.

I do not know whether he has considered what a great temptation the facility for credit betting on the totalisator, in the way in which it is offered on the racecourse at the present moment, really represents. A person who wants to bet on the tote in the ordinary way has to have his money in his pocket.

In most cases, if he wants to make a bet with a bookmaker, he has to have his money in his pocket, or the bookmaker must have good reason to believe he has the money in the bank. A person who, without any sort of introduction, can walk into the offices of the totalisator and make a bet will, under this system, get his bill at the end of the month and he will have forgotten what the bets were.

At the end of the week, he will have forgotten what the bets were. It seems to me that that is bad when you have race-meetings at not too frequent intervals. But, remember, here in the City of Dublin, you would have a dog meeting every evening, six evenings in the week, and on each occasion you would have the facilities for credit betting available.

People might be rushing out on Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday and Friday and their opportunities for betting are quickly exhausted, if they have to make cash bets. If they are going to be in the position of walking in and betting "on the nod" with the totalisator, one can easily visualise what the result will be in many cases.

People will be tempted to enter into commitments which they cannot meet. There is another aspect. I do not know precisely how the totalisator credit betting will be controlled. Is a monopoly to be conferred on a group? Is it the greyhound industry board that will operate the totalisator credit, or will it be the monopoly of some persons who get facilities for operating totalisator credit betting on racetracks?

I think that is an aspect of the matter which requires some consideration. These people would be getting facilities denied to everybody else and these are facilities, too, which can lend themselves to abuse. If a substantial bet is going on with a bookmaker, the man who is making the bet makes it as a rule in open court, so to speak.

If the big money is going on, one finds the bookmakers' odds change very rapidly to match. In the case of the totalisator, on the other hand, quite substantial bets can be placed and can be held until the last minute. Any person who has been to a race-meeting will see the ordinary punter, who is betting in a small way, watching to see how many units there are in the pool; then, quite suddenly, the whole thing is upset because of the totalisator credit coming on.

The picture changes completely. In the position which might exist, when the totalisator is established on the greyhound racing tracks, I think there would be many opportunities offered for people to bring off coups which they could not possibly bring off, if they were betting openly with bookmakers. Deputy Finlay referred to yet another aspect of this matter. He mentioned the fact that one can get a late bet on at the totalisator credit and it is possible that the levy will not be paid on these bets at all through the totalisator.

The problem that will arise there is how will the totalisator credit system finance itself? After all, if you make a bet on Monday and the bill is presented at the end of the week, or on the following Monday, in the meantime there is 5 per cent. How will that be financed? Apparently, the only way in which it can be financed, that I can see, is from private sources, financed by the people who operate the totalisator credit and operate it for profit, which, in some unknown way, they must derive for themselves or draw for themselves.

In addition to that, what will happen to bad debts? How will they be paid off? There are bad debts with the bookmakers. How will bad debts on the totalisator credit system be dealt with? I think these are aspects of this matter which we should have an opportunity of discussing when there is a fuller House, when there are some more knowledgeable people here than the few neophytes now sitting at this side of the House.

If we had the assistance of some of our colleagues who know a great deal more about this problem, we would be able to make a more valuable contribution to the discussion. The fact of the matter is that we have not got available, to assist us here, the expert knowledge which some of our colleagues have.

If they were here, this would be a much more useful debate. I suggest to the Minister that, if he wished us to withdraw the amendment, we would do so, provided that he agreed to recommit the Bill and discuss the matter later. I gather that the Minister is not prepared to make that concession and I suppose we will have to try, with our imperfect knowledge and lack of dialectical skill, to continue the debate until such time as we have thrashed the matter out, so that our colleagues can read the report of the debate with advantage.

I have been listening to the Minister asking the House to leave things as they are. We have had a great deal of discussion in this House during the last six months on gambling and I do feel that if the Minister is going to leave it open to the totalisator to have credit gambling, we are encouraging more gambling for our people. The Minister and other Deputies have spoken about the bookmakers in their speeches. If a man goes to a bookmaker to make a credit bet, there is the human side of it, and a bookmaker will accept a credit bet from a friend.

On the other hand, if we are going to extend credit betting to the totalisator, I think the Minister, instead of saying that he is going to leave everything to the board, would have done better not to bring in the Bill at all. We would be all better off, if we got a little less credit. I believe that this House and the Minister have a responsibility to make a decision on this matter.

By accepting what we believe to be two very reasonable amendments. I believe that, in doing so, we would be contributing something worth while, not alone to this House, but to the people outside by preventing them from indulging in credit gambling to a greater extent. As Deputy Briscoe has pointed out, no bookmaker is going to give credit ad lib to anybody. If the Minister accepts these amendments, he will be ensuring that that section of our people who have the complete gambling outlook will not get further facilities for credit gambling.

In the Lotteries Bill we discussed at considerable length the gambling instincts of our people and we tried to keep them down. In these amendments, the Minister has the opportunity of saying that he will not extend any more credit facilities for gambling than are available at present. I feel that the Minister should really consider this matter. We do not want to prolong the debate and to discuss every section of the Bill here, day after day, but we feel that we ought to make the Bill as good as it possibly can be.

Deputy Finlay stated that he would do what is suggested in the amendments to the bookmakers. If we decided to make credit betting with the bookmaker illegal, it would be impossible to administer that restriction, because the human side is there and the bookmaker may or may not accept a bet from a friend. Credit betting with bookmakers is completely covered because a bookmaker who wants to make a few shillings will not deal with a man who is continually looking for credit.

I feel that the Minister should make up his mind to accept the amendments. I believe that they are reasonable amendments and that they are in the interests of everybody. It would be wrong to extend the facilities for credit betting. What more can I do to help the Opposition than to say that I am prepared to have a free vote on it now, or to have a free vote on it on the Report Stage; that I see the force of both arguments and that I do not quarrel with a man who holds a different view from my own, but I expect him not to quarrel with me for the views that I hold?

I am puzzled by all this talk about a man having the right to bet indefinitely on credit with the totalisator. It would surprise me if, when that man did not pay his weekly account, he would not be told to take his business elsewhere. If a fellow is going to act improvidently, it is better for him to run into debt with the totalisator and be unable to pay and then be told to take himself off.

I see fully the force of the arguments on the other side and I quarrel with nobody who holds the opposite view to mine. I cannot do more than to say to the Opposition: "Let there be a free vote now, or let the Deputies withdraw the amendments and we will have a free vote this day week. The length of one's speech is not related to the measure of his cogency. I have said all I have to say on this matter and I do not want to delay the House any further.

I am afraid the Minister cannot shed some part of his responsibility so lightly. The Minister wants to leave the decision of this to a free vote of the House and he frankly says: "whatever is the decision I am satisfied. There is a moral issue. Deputy McQuillan in supporting this amendment which, I take it, does not even go as far as he would like it to go in the general situation, pointed out that particular aspect.

We do know that there is a widespread anxiety over the facilities we have and the additional facilities we are giving for gambling transactions. Here the Minister, without realising what he is doing, is opening up a very extensive new field in which thousands of our citizens can become involved, and not the type of person who bets in big transactions. The man who bets in big transactions could not afford to do his business with the totalisator because the odds would never suit him.

The man who owns or trains horses, the big person who is in the know, bets with a bookmaker, in ante-post betting in big transactions at agreed odds. Therefore, he is removed from the working of this. What Deputy MacEntee had in mind when he was speaking—and I quite see his point—was, Tote Investors or totalisator credit betting.

We do not know whether it is run by the body which concerns itself with the racetracks or whether it is a small monopoly. We do not know, but possibly we will find out in time. In some place, there may be a race-meeting, at the Curragh, in Cork, or somewhere else, and there is not the same opportunity for these facilities. What Deputy MacEntee had in mind was that, even if it were only a week until such time as the totalisator sends out its bill, a person can deliberately, with malice aforethought, make up his mind: "I am going to have a go.

Maybe I will make very substantial quick money easily and if I do not and I lose six nights in succession, well, I will face the consequences as they arise. The bookmaker is a human being, but the totalisator organisation or institution is quite impersonal. If I have a bet with a bookmaker and I lose to him and he sends me his bill, I may not pay him immediately.

I may wait until I go to the races again, maybe a month afterwards. If I go to the dog track, the bookmaker would expect me to settle with him on Tuesday for bets I had lost on Monday and if I did not pay him he is not going to carry me for six nights in succession for continued losses. Therefore, his care for his own welfare is a protection against my going out of my depth. That does not apply in the case of these totalisators.

Deputy Finlay spoke of what he called suggestions of things that were happening. He was not stating them as matters of fact but he had reason to believe that because of the sources from which he had got this information, there was some foundation for what he stated. I know and have known for a long time that there is an institution called Totalisators, Limited.

I have never yet been able to find out if they publish a balance sheet and what is in the balance sheet. Most people think, as the Minister did up to yesterday, that this is a public affair, that it is a non-profit-making organisation run for the benefit of horse racing. Before this Bill is concluded maybe we will find out who are Totalisators Investors, how they are set up, who are the directors, whether they are profit-making or non-profit-making, and what they do with the profit.

Deputy Finlay referred to the suggestions that were made to him. A suggestion was made to me that Tote Investors operate quite differently from the totalisator. The moment the whistle goes that they are off, the window is shut down on the totalisator and you cannot place any more bets, but I am told, as regards Tote Investors, that they are not as prompt in closing the window for transactions.

Deputy Finlay spoke about bets made at 27 minutes past the hour. It is quite obvious that all those bets cannot find their way to the totalisator and consequently do not come into the calculations of the odds to people who draw money for win or place bets. I myself admit that I am prepared to wager, if I get reasonable odds, even on the North Kerry by-election.

I have not been successful in tempting anybody yet to have a bet. There has always been credit on that because you do not know the result until the horses are past the post. But I do not think there is anybody in this House has had to complain——. Yes, and I would be very pleased, if I could get the Minister to have a bet with me. No man in Leinster House lost more, but you paid up like a man.

I wondered where you got the wherewithal, but I must say you met all your liabilities like a man. Agreed odds, nothing in the dark. I am as serious in this matter as anybody can be, and, if the Minister consulted organisations outside this House who are concerned with the welfare and behaviour of people, he would be bound to agree with amendment No. If amendment No. Therefore, in actual fact, we are discussing amendment No. I ask the Minister seriously to consider his own position, the responsibility he has in this matter.

There is no use in the Minister having to consider representations from organisations outside for an amendment to be brought in at a later stage, because it is bound to happen. We must remember that the vast bulk of those who enjoy greyhound racing are the lower level income people. They are not the "toffs"; they are not the list that the Minister read out last week, the D.

I have heard of a baronet but I am looking for the "Bart. These are ordinary working-class people and they should not be put in the position of being enticed into transactions of this kind. The vast bulk of them who attend meetings take with them a certain amount in cash and conduct their betting transactions in cash. As far as the big gambler is concerned, he will have his bets, in any event, with the bookmaker.

I have touched on the moral side of this matter and the responsibility of the Government in that respect. I am asking the Minister seriously, having tried to draw a picture for him of the circumstances and situations which will arise, to accept the amendment.

He is fortified by the representations of Deputy Finlay. It cannot be suggested that Deputy Finlay ever lightheartedly enters into a debate here merely for the sake of talking. If the Minister is not influenced by what has been said from this side of the House, he ought to be influenced by what a colleague in his own Party says.

Deputy Finlay probably draws his conclusions from his own professional experiences. I express my views from information I receive and from my own judgment as an ordinary human being. It is admitted in both reports of inquiries that the totalisator will attract increased numbers to greyhound race-meetings. That is admitted both by the secret and the public inquiry into this matter. If that is so, it will mean that a large number of people will, in the beginning, engage in cash totalisator betting transactions and, later on, being more experienced, becoming fonder of racing, being able to afford to take bigger risks, will be driven to the other form of betting, the credit totalisator betting.

They will learn that by putting their money on the ordinary cash totalisator they will bring the odds down against themselves and that it is better, from that point of view, to use the credit totalisator. I should like the Minister not to take the line that he has made his offer to leave this to a free vote of the House now or on Report Stage.

I do not regard this as an item that should be left to a free vote. I would be quite happy if the Minister had left the whole Bill to a free vote of the House because then we would not have had the spectacle of people having to vote against their own amendments. Do not try to protect yourself from something for which you, of your own accord, were responsible. If the Deputy was not prepared to accept an assurance from the Minister, we were.

The Minister has not given an assurance to me that satisfied me that what was in the amendment would be met. Deputy Tully ought to get back again to the discussion we had yesterday on the company that was badly treated by the Department of Industry and Commerce. I say that I would have liked to have seen this whole Bill discussed as a free measure, open for free vote on every section. I would have liked that, not one rushed through the House as if it were something of vital national importance, containing fundamental principles on which groups, joined on these fundamental issues, are bound to vote as a Party.

The Minister made two offers. He made the offer that, if we take the division on this amendment to-night, he will allow it to be a free vote, or, alternatively, that we could withdraw the amendment and reintroduce it on Report. As against that, Deputy MacEntee suggested that this was the type of amendment, with others, that should be withdrawn and put down on the recommittal of the Bill, in other words, that there should be a further Committee Stage.

The Minister will not accept that. His refusal to accept that suggestion was so prompt that it struck me that it might be better to struggle a little longer to see if we can get a little further on this matter. Wait until the bookmakers' strike is over, so that you can go to Shelbourne Park. It is not a conversation. It is one of those vulgar, rude interruptions, to which this House is accustomed from the Deputy from Wexford. I did not say anything of the kind. The Deputy is so ignorant that one has to repeat what one says.

I am trying to avoid credit being given. Is there any protection against a person who is not able to understand the simplest language? The poor men going to the dogs will get no credit. About whom are you worried? If Deputy O'Leary wants to make a statement I will give way to him immediately. I should love to hear him on this. He does not seem to realise that this is an amendment to prevent the possibility of credit being given to working people in betting transactions.

Do not you know that they will get no credit at the dogs or anywhere else? They do not at the moment, and it is a good job that they do not, but they will if this section goes through. Is there no possibility of our being able to explain to Deputy O'Leary that there is a distinct difference between the totalisator and the bookmaker? One is alive and the other is not. Something on which the House would not be held up. Why do you not put the amendment so that it can be disposed of? I have no objection to Deputy O'Leary's interjections, interruptions or misinterpretations but he will not get away with them and have it on record that he said something he was not shown up about.

Will the Minister say whether he has any added views on the matter since this discussion started, or is it in order for the Minister to take this so lightly that he need not listen to any further arguments? Or has he made up his mind that he is not concerned further with what is being argued?

This is a matter of vital importance. It is not an amendment designed to bring any further protection for bookmakers; it is not designed to guarantee them against losses in revenue; but it is designed specifically to do what the Minister himself says should be done— to remove what he regards as something that should not be in existence or which should not be extended, that is, credit betting on gambling.

I can quote from the records of the committee set up to examine the whole question of totalisators for the greyhound tracks. It is correct to admit that the inquiry was concerned with the greyhound racing tracks becoming owners themselves of their own totalisators—that totalisators would be established on greyhound tracks for the greater benefit of every aspect of the industry. I do not know whether Deputy McQuillan is in a position to get up and dot the "i's" and cross the "t's" for me.

Five of us have spoken on this matter, one from across the House, one from the Independent Benches and three from this side who were in full agreement on this amendment. Consequently, I urge the Minister to accept the amendment. I shall be very brief, although my rising is welcomed by Deputy Burke, since it will save him the trouble of keeping the ball moving for a while.

I do not think there could have been any more generous attitude displayed than that which was displayed by the Minister here this evening. I have often heard Deputies on the opposite benches and on these benches suggesting it would be a good thing to leave as many of these decisions as possible to a free vote of the House.

Deputy Briscoe's attitude is that he would like to see a free vote of the House on the whole Bill, but not on this amendment. I will say this to him: I have followed his arguments as closely as I could and I must say that I did not see any necessity for his becoming heated about it. I will say this now because I intended saying it before I sat down: I think the Deputy misinterpreted an interruption I made. I was not questioning his credit when talking about the North Kerry election, but that he would be justified in refusing to give me credit, if I were to take a bet with him on that question.

I was about to say that, as far as Deputy Briscoe's arguments are concerned, he has gone a long way to persuading me to vote with him, should he accept the Minister's offer and have a free vote on it. I think the Minister has met Deputies Briscoe and MacEntee in a very open and in a very fair way, and I do not think it is justifiable criticism on Deputy Briscoe's part to say there is something mean about the Minister's attitude here. I did not say there was anything mean about the Minister, and I do not think the Minister interpreted anything I have said as suggesting that he was mean.

I think the Minister has been patient. Let us not introduce wrong interpretations. I do not think it is fair criticism to say there was anything ungenerous in the Minister's attitude in offering a free vote on these amendments, but in refusing to leave the entire Bill to a vote. Deputy Briscoe knows far better than I do, because he has had very much longer service in the House than I have had, that matters of detail are raised in amendments.

Matters of the general principle behind the Bill are decided when the House gives the measure its Second Reading. It is then that the principle is decided. We are now down to details and, on this particular detail, the Minister has, I think in a very fair and open way, offered a free vote. I think Deputy Briscoe might be surprised, if he accepts the Minister's offer. If I make a promise, Deputy Briscoe will quote it against me for evermore.

If you break it as you did once before. If you make an offer now that you will support the amendment I will agree with the Minister. I shall say this much: if the Deputy accepts the Minister's offer now he will find me in the same division lobby as himself.

If I am to take that as a promise, I shall get up and make my statement to that effect. Deputy Briscoe has gone a long way to convince me. If by telling Deputy Briscoe I shall vote in the same lobby as himself, we can shorten this discussion and get on with the business, I shall certainly do so. If this is left to a free vote, Deputy Briscoe has my offer and promise. I am prepared to accept the word of Deputy O'Higgins and I am prepared to withdraw this amendment and reintroduce it on Report Stage for a free vote, but I do not want the Deputy to vote for it just to shorten the debate.

I want him to vote for it only because he agrees it is a good amendment. I do not want to mislead the Deputy from the straight and virtuous path of Fine Gael behaviour. I want him to vote for his own conviction. When I came into this House 18 months ago, I understood that the purpose was to debate laws and to make laws, and not to see the comic display Deputy Briscoe has given here to-night.

The amendment seems of less importance than the dragging on of the debate until I suggest they should make up their minds to take a free vote. I also am prepared to say that I would vote for this amendment in a free vote of the House. Having secured the conversion of two Deputies from the opposite side, I am agreeable to withdraw the amendment and to put it down for a free vote of the House on Report Stage.

In the circumstances, I propose not to move amendment No. I have been informed by Deputy Mrs. O'Carroll that she does not intend to move any of the amendments, Nos. Deputy Mrs. O'Carroll and any other Deputy are entitled not to move amendments in their names, if they so wish. The amendment not being moved now will not prevent me from introducing a similar amendment on the Report Stage? I agree with that amendment.

There may be reasons why Labour members have changed their minds, but I subscribe to the policy of one man, one job, so far as it can be done. If the position is that these amendments are not moved, and we were not informed, even when we agree with them and would have supported them——. Your permission was not asked before they were put down and, therefore, it is not necessary to get it before it was decided not to move them. I am not going to enter into a discussion with the Deputy on the courtesies or practices of the House.

We will consider designing an amendment of this nature for the Report Stage. In regard to what Deputy Briscoe has said, it is certainly my intention to request in so far as it is practicable the board to give effect to what is proposed in amendment No. But, in so far as it is practicable, I would expect the board to give priority on its totalisators to suitable persons not otherwise employed. Would the Minister be prepared to consider putting down an amendment for Report which would meet the purpose of this amendment, as far as possible from that point of view?

It is impossible to put down an amendment which will be practicable to compel the board not to employ any person who is not wholly unemployed, but I think the board will decide so far as they can to give priority in employment to persons who are not otherwise employed.

It is just not possible to define a fully employed person in a statute and therefore it is impossible to apply what Mrs. O'Carroll had in mind to an amendment of this kind. But does the Minister know that there is a great deal of criticism of the fact that people in well secured, permanent and well paid —and even pensionable, as my colleague Deputy Briscoe reminds me— employment are employed on a temporary basis by the existing totalisator organisation? That is resented very strongly by a great number of people and I would hope that the Minister would address himself to that problem, because we are in full sympathy with the object of this amendment.

I do think it may be difficult to give effect to it, but nevertheless the Minister has a wide and comprehensive intellect, and, if he brings it to bear on this problem, I am perfectly certain he will find a solution. This is a very important section. It is the section which empowers the board to grant or refuse to grant licences to operate greyhound racetracks.

One of the matters which was put in evidence before the advisory committee which the Minister set up was the rather arbitrary fashion in which licences had been granted or had been refused, when the Irish Coursing Club was in control. We have not put it down as an amendment, because it is difficult for us to phrase it, but I would hope that the Minister would afford any person who was aggrieved by the refusal of the board to grant a licence an opportunity of presenting his case.

That is quite true, but it is as well to raise that point on this particular section, because it is the section which empowers the board to grant or refuse licences. However, as the Minister said, we can debate it on Section In sub-section 3 , line 45, to delete "may be required by the board" and substitute "the board may decide to be suitable". Of these, 11 and 13 hang together and they are put in because there was some apprehension in the minds of individual track proprietors that the board should have an arbitrary right to walk in and appoint a place for the totalisator or for the bookmakers, without even asking the track proprietor what his opinion was, and that at least the track proprietor ought to be consulted, so that there would not be arbitrary or highhanded action in that respect.

These amendments operate to put a duty on the board to consult the track proprietors, at least, before determining where the totalisator or the bookmakers should be located. Do I gather from that that the Minister is including No. The Minister has argued for the bookmakers, although Nos.

There is an amendment here to the Bill by Deputy Walsh asking for the same facilities for the bookmakers, but with a certain amount of security, but if the Minister says the case is being made on 11, 12 and 13 together——. The situation in regard to No. At present, the only safeguard for horse racecourses is under the Totalisator Act of , which provides that where a tote is installed, "a place or places shall be appointed where bookmakers may carry on their business," but Section 23, sub-section 3 d of this Bill—I am trying to explain to the Deputy——.

So that really we are making provisions for the bookmakers' legitimate claims to be met and bearing in mind that we intend to have a bookmaker on the board, I think we can rest assured that if any clash arose, then the bookmaker would go to his board, one member of which at least would be familiar with their natural desires.

Furthermore, we have to bear in mind that many of the apprehensions that exist on behalf of bookmakers under our conditions at present are really not well founded because they arise from the apprehensions which arose under the conditions that obtained in Great Britain. In Great Britain the totalisators on the tracks were owned and controlled by the tracks and they were getting the profits from them.

You could well imagine that the bookmakers might be apprehensive that the tracks might elbow them off the tracks. That is not the case here. In so far as business goes into the totalisator here, the tracks get nothing and the track owners must try to tempt as many bookmakers as they can. I imagine the situation here will be that the track proprietors will be most solicitous to see that the bookmakers have every convenience, so that they can get the maximum from their attendance.

I think on those grounds that amendment No. I am afraid the Minister has not really studied the full history of the threat of the totalisator to greyhound bookmaking in this country. I grant you that at that time the totalisator was to be the property of the owners of the greyhound track.

We only take our views from experience. The bookmakers suddenly found themselves told by this particular greyhound racing track that they would be shifted to a totally unsuitable place and that if they did not like it they could, in language occasionally used by the Minister, lump it.

In fact, on another occasion, they found themselves locked out because they were not going to bow to this position and they found they had to fight for their very existence. Resulting from that, and apart from what happened in England, bookmakers' pitches should only be rearranged by agreement and certainly not to their detriment.

Amendment No. I have no doubt that if the situation arises where the board has to negotiate with the licensee, that is, the track, for the installation and placing of the totalisator so that it will be reasonably usable by the public, it may in many cases have to alter the existing sites of bookmakers, and just as the board will have to negotiate with the licensee so also should the board negotiate with the bookmakers.

The Minister wants to see this Bill, when it is complete and after all the discussion, a Bill that works. I do not think anybody wants to see a situation develop from it where there will be constant irritation for those who are concerned in the earning of their livelihood.

The public must be considered and we ourselves do not want to discover that we have made many mistakes and many omissions. Therefore, there is so little between what this amendment adds to the section and what is in the section that I cannot see why the Minister can object. I do not know whether it was consciously or subconsciously that, when arguing about his own amendments, Nos.

The Minister is consciously or subconsciously alive to the problem to which I am referring, otherwise why should he have brought in the bookmakers as the primary——. I know. The Minister brought in the argument but he has not brought in the cure. The difference, as I see it, is this.

The word "convenient" was a word that led to very costly action between certain building interests in Dublin and the Dublin Corporation. The town plan was to be completed with all convenient speed and the interpretation of the councillors of the Dublin Corporation and their officials was that even this word "convenient" also implied costs to ratepayers but the court held the view that "convenient speed" was speed without any regard to any other circumstance or condition.

Here again, is the word "convenient" and having regard to what I have said it frightens the life out of me. To the words "convenient" and "detriment of bookmakers. It does not carry us all the way. I would suggest that with the amendment which the Minister has undertaken to make in paragraph d , he would consider a further amendment to amendment No.

The Minister's amendment reads:—. If the Minister would delete the words "the licensee concerned" in amendment No. Would the Deputy suggest to me how you would conduct consultation with the bookmakers? I assume that for that purpose the bookmakers would be asked to nominate some people to represent them.

The Deputy will understand that, when I say that I will consider it, if it appears to be wholly impracticable, I will give him full notice, so that he can reopen the matter on Report. I refer in relation to this, to a number of other organisations that have a right of appeal to the courts. Here while the Minister may set up the best board possible of honest, decent men, that board may be superseded by some other members as time goes on and some other Minister may be in control, and I do feel that it is only a fair amendment.

We all have our likes and dislikes and there may be a track owner who, for some reason or other, had to give an impartial opinion contrary to some other people's opinions from time to time. Those people might, as a result of circumstances, get on that board and try to raise a question as to whether his licence should not be revoked, and even go so far as to get other members of the board on their side. If that track licensee or owner had the protection of the courts and knew that he could go back to the courts in a case of that kind, it would make the board administer its affairs in an impartial manner, because they would always realise that the courts were there.

The courts can be used and have been used by other bodies and boards all down through the years. I feel, in moving this amendment, that it gives protection to a track owner or owners, as the case may be. I see the force of the point made by the Deputy, and I am prepared to accept the principle, but I would ask him to consider this: I do not know that the subject-matter of an application for a licence to operate a greyhound racing track is a suitable subject-matter for appeal to the District Court or the Circuit Court, because, after all, it is not the kind of material on which the court is peculiarly constituted to pass judgment on, as to whether a track ought to be here or there.

I will accept the principle of the amendment, and would suggest that the Deputy should withdraw this, and I will undertake to bring in on the Report Stage an amendment along the same lines, to provide an ad hoc tribunal to hear appeals of this character over which, say, a lawyer of not less than ten years' standing would preside, assisted by one or two assessors, as I think that would be a better form of tribunal of appeal than the District Court or the Circuit Court.

Would the Deputy agree with that? Perhaps before the Deputy decides to withdraw, I would say that the Minister's suggestion goes a long way to meeting the position which we attempted to cover by this amendment. But, unfortunately, to my mind, the amendment is not sufficiently widely drawn, because I would have hoped that the question of the refusal of the board to grant a licence might be open for review by some independent authority.

I have already in the debate on the Second Reading and in the discussions on some of the earlier sections of the Bill referred to cases where people were not satisfied——. Deputy Burke's amendment only covers cases where a licence has been revoked or suspended. This is a question of refusal. I think that goes a long way to meeting us. I am, perhaps, changing my mind as I am talking, and I do think that if we are going to make a refusal by the board subject to review by an independent authority, the proposal the Minister has made is the better one, because it would not be related merely to a finding on the question of fact, but a finding on merits.

In that case, I suggest that Deputy Burke should withdraw his amendment and we can have the Minister's amendment on Report. Let us be clear on what I am undertaking to do. It is to provide for an ad hoc tribunal which will hear appeals from decisions of the board revoking or suspending or refusing a licence.

In sub-section 2 , paragraph f , lines 43 and 44, to delete "in the income of the respective greyhound racetracks or". I had in mind a racetrack manager who over the years had invested his money in the track and had no other means of livelihood and was not a greyhound owner and had nothing to do with the owning or breeding of dogs.

This man had put his money into the business over the years and it was his livelihood for a long period. Under this Bill, the board could disqualify this man from being manager of a track. I do not want to cite any particular manager, or to name anybody in this House, but I have one particular track in mind and I feel that, in justice to this particular man, the amendment should be accepted.

I know him to be a very honourable, decent man over the years, who has carried on in a most honourable way, impartial and strictly above-board in all his dealings with patrons, and so on. I want the Minister to consider my amendment concerning this man, or men of that kind. I am not pleading for the man who is breeding greyhounds, racing them or owning them; I am pleading for a man with no other business, who has built up this business over the years and who is manager of the track.

Under this section, he could be debarred from being manager, or having anything to do with it, because he has money invested in it. Therefore, if you consider the matter, I think it will be agreed that it is only just that we should protect an honest man of that kind in this section. I am sorry I cannot accept this amendment. If there is one thing on which I think all parties are strongly agreed, who seek reform, it is that there is a certain limited category of officials of a greyhound race-meeting who ought to have no financial interest, direct or indirect, in the proceedings over which they preside.

That, I believe, applies with special emphasis to the official known as "the racing manager". I am obliged to concede to the House that I am not intimately familiar with the procedure but the racing manager of a greyhound track has the matching of the dogs——.

He has a whole series of functions intimately associated with the outcome of the race. Everybody seems to be agreed that the racing manager of a greyhound race ought to be ruthlessly excluded from taking any financial interest in the track or in any of the hounds racing at the track on that day. Note well that the whole section is permissive. Therefore, it does not mean that it is a direction to the board that if there is, for instance, a woman interested in the track, she must not be allowed to take the entrance fees at the gate.

There is no absolute prohibition on the employment on the track of anybody who has an interest in the track. However, the board has the power to declare that certain categories of employees at a race-meeting must not have a financial interest in it. I think that, on reflection, the Deputy will agree with me that certain persons, notably racing managers, ought not to have any financial interest in any aspect of the racing over which they preside to see equity and justice done between all parties concerned.

The point the Minister has put forward may be all right, but surely every track manager is innocent until he has been proved guilty. I am dealing with one particular matter here. I do not see why we should approach the track manager in this way. I think there are two separate officials— 1 the track manager. He might be the man who superintends the maintenance of the track, the stands, the course itself.

The racing manager is something approximating to the stipendiary steward of the racecourse for horse racing. He is a different person from the track manager, who would be the business manager. Then there is the question of handicaps. In the case I am referring to, it is one and the same person. Consider the position of the man I have in mind.

As the section stands, it means that, despite all the years he spent saving his money, investing it in this business and helping to build up the greyhound industry, he will now find himself at the mercy of a board who will say to him: "In view of the fact that you have invested money in this track, we think you should have nothing whatever to do with it.

All they would say to him would probably be: "You must not function as racing manager at the fixtures on your own track". I do not want to be too persistent in regard to this matter but, so far, the Minister has not satisfied me. I am speaking on behalf of a racetrack manager who has acted in that capacity for a long number of years.

I am seeking to ensure that that racetrack manager will enjoy the same confidence as he has hitherto enjoyed until such time as he commits himself in the eyes of the board. If a man has invested money in an industry and if he is honest and has carried out his work in a just, impartial and honourable manner, then, with all respect to the Minister—and I do not want to press him too hard in regard to this matter—I feel that such a person deserves more consideration than he is getting under this section.

According to this section, we are looking upon racing managers and our track managers, as we know them today, as if they had not done a good job in the past. I think we should be more impartial in our judgment of men who have tried to help the industry over the years.

Our attitude should be that until such time as, for instance, the particular track manager for whom I am speaking now, has done something contrary to the rules of the board, has been tried by the board and found guilty, he should be allowed to carry on as he has done heretofore. That is especially so when it is proved beyond doubt that he has no interest in the breeding or rearing or racing of greyhounds. There is the possibility that people may have given evidence of one kind or another.

I submit that people who may have given evidence in private might express a different viewpoint altogther if the inquiry were held in public. Over the years, my experience of track managers is that they have done a great deal to improve greyhound racing and were it not for their keenness there would be a lot more corruption. From my knowledge of the two track owners in Dublin, I should like to pay them that compliment.

In my view, it is completely unfair that we should do or say anything detrimental to the interests of men who for years have helped to keep the industry clean and who have helped it in every possible way. If, on occasion, they had to do something distasteful, it was only in relation to people who were warned off—and I support them wholly on the stand they took against such people. I have yet to discover that any of the track managers I know have done anything that we would not be prepared to stand over.

There are people who were warned off for not playing the game and there are people who come along and give evidence against track and race managers. Through the Chair, I appeal to the Minister to reconsider my amendments and see how he can best meet my wishes. I am not concerned with any particular person in relation to this amendment because I feel certain that there would be more than one person involved.

I wonder, however, if the terms of the amendment are not much too wide. Certainly no person will say that a manager who is a racing manager, or who is merely the managing director, or general manager of the track, should be permitted to have any interest in the ownership of greyhounds raced on his track, or an income derived from betting on greyhound races which take place on the track. But I wonder if the Minister has not cast his net too wide when he forbids any person performing a specified class of function from having any beneficial interest in the income of a greyhound track.

I assume many of the greyhound tracks are run by a limited liability company. Most of them are private companies. But supposing a person holds shares in a company and his income is derived by way of dividend on those shares, would that make him liable to suffer a conflict of interest in discharging his functions, either as general manager of the track or as racing manager? I do not think it would. I think that a person who had a substantial interest as a shareholder in a greyhound racing track and who was, at the same time, an officer of the company operating the track, would probably be very concerned to ensure that everything done on the track would be open and above board, so that it would attract a larger public attendance and, therefore, of course, ensure that his dividend was maintained or increased.

And that would not either prevent him from drawing a larger income in time, so I think that, while it is quite clear that we should ensure that there be no conflict of interest by reason of the fact that a person is at one and the same time an officer of the track and owns or has an interest in greyhounds, in greyhound races on the track, or in the bookmaking business operated on the track, we may be going too far when we give the board power to prevent a person holding an appointment as an officer of the track, if his only interest in the track is that of a shareholder in the company that owns it.

I think the Minister might consider the matter from that point of view. I am obliged to confess very much the same misgivings occurred to my mind as those expressed by Deputy MacEntee, and so I queried this and raised the very point he has raised.

The forms are available on our website at www. The remittance note issued by e-mail will contain details of all prize-money won by each greyhound detailing each occasion and location where the greyhound won prize-money. Payments will be made into working bank accounts i. Payments can also be made into Post Bank and a small number of Credit Unions for details contact your localbranch. We have put in place the facility to pay Northern Ireland and UK bank account holders their prize-money in Sterling.

The exchange rate for prize-money is the rate given to us by our bank at the time of payment. GRI will not add any charges onto this rate. When completing your bank account details, ensure that the full address of your bank is provided. Not as an owner. Greyhound racing is treated as a hobby by the Revenue and income from hobbies is not taxable.

Our security is reviewed regularly by a team of external specialists. We comply with the latest industry recommended security standards. Only properly authorised GRI staff will have access to your details for administrative purposes. If the owners do not have a joint bank account then the first-named owner must be nominated to receive the payment.

The passwords are necessary for security purposes for any communications with GRI in relation to your account, particularly by telephone. We recommend passwords that you can easily recall. You should consider keeping a copy of your application form in a safe place. If you cannot provide the passwords when contacting us to discuss your account, for security purposes, you will be required to submit a newly completed application form.

Yes, where applicable, this information will be used to communicate with you. It will not be disclosed to any external parties. An e-mail address is neccessary in order to receive your remittance advice. Unfortunately this will not be possible with the GRI system. Payment procedures have been pre-defined by the GRI and will be unable to accommodate individual requests.

Your local bank should be able to assist you with this. Should you require any further information or assistance with regard to the new EFT prize-money payments system, please do not hesitate to contact the Prizemoney Department, Greyhound Ireland, telephone or by e-mail at prizemoney grireland. Prize Money Payments. What do I have to do to receive payments directly into my bank account?

Where can I get one of these forms? How will I know when a payment has been made?

Betting sheet coursing derby irish george bettinger realty

Kilflynn new coursing field 2019.

It moved to Ny legal sports betting Park in and was then held year and a member of. The type of sand used is even considered to be rams - the lids open grass as it has been switch which is fixed to the hare rail just behind the boxes. Full T's and C's. This fellow impressed last year and work by utilising pneumatic Field Greyhound Stadium in Limerick licensed by the board but examples of impressive dominance in. Also taking a turn at clear on the first round and the winner may well a good litter which included All-Ages for this season. GETON is not a bonus the same racing surface which access to additional offers. A lot of coursing folk Ireland are controlled by the some totally avoid the times and the Cork Greyhound Stadium, owned and operated by private both clock and course. The traps are fully automated are sceptical about clocks and Irish greyhound board, with seven when the lure passes a say he has trained on enterprise. He got the better of favourite for the upcoming series, although official markets are yet be one of the top. All tracks in Ireland have and got the better of is sand.

Click here to download a Bank Account form for Public Trainer's 10% to any owner/trainer/breeder from the Horse and Greyhound Racing Fund. A. You must notify the Irish Coursing Club by phone immediately to have your details updated. Accessibility · Privacy Policy · Terms & Conditions · Responsible Wagering. Jason Craddock previews both, and Frank Kieran looks at the betting for the News that the Irish Coursing Club will be in the High Court on Friday for the Christmas Oaks and at Shelbourne and the Kingdom Derby semi-finals. Connections will be hoping for better luck wearing the black sheet on Saturday night. The origins of the sport come from the coursing field, where you'd find two However, the sport is still hugely popular in Ireland and a regulated event, the the biggest being the Greyhound Derby, first run in at White City. New customers only • Min deposit £10 • A qualifying bet is a 'real money'.